Barack Needs to Get Chippy with Condescending McCain
Posted: Saturday, September 27, 2008
by Missing Link
Barack Obama needs to get a little spark of nastiness with John McCain. He stands there debating him as an equal while McCain treats him like a kid in the principal's office. Obama has the intellect and the knowledge to slam him, to challenge him, to stir up some anger, but he isn't doing it. It didn't look smart to me, it looked tentative and cautious and McCain looked like a cranky old man who was being forced to spend time debating a young pup.
The way that the kid can always win with the principal is to get him to lose his sense of adult superiority. Obama needs to do just that. McCain's no saint, he's got a 26 year record. Slam him with it over and over again. Connect him to Bush because he is connected. Connect him to ineptitude of Washington, because he is. Counter this Maverick crap, point out that it isn't always a good thing because as it is in this bailout crisis, it keeps him from even leading his own party! It's all there for the taking, COME ON!
I want to see some grit out of Obama, I want to see some fiery leadership in my President. I want some steel. I did not see that last night. I saw a few blips of it and then he'd slip into his grin at Lehrer to intervene with McCain instead of bulling his way into the conversation.
COME ON! Drop that hockey stick throw down the gloves, even slap on a little lipstick if that's what it takes but I wanted to see some fireworks. It was so BLAH!
For my part I saw a few things that McCain said which are interesting:
1. McCain wants to make sure that health care isn't nationalized. Well my friends, that's what's going to happen because as the population ages here and the Boomers move into cancer and heart attacks, the Insurance Industry is going to go bankrupt. We have a greedy system of health care that is racking up HUGE profits and raising their costs beyond all rationality. So what is the government going to do about it? I tell you, that is the next economic domino. It may not tumble for a while but it will unless someone gets some control over its ability to charge whatever it wants to.
2. He used the term "Miss Congeniality" twice in the debate – Is John McCain a cross-dressing, closet case like J. Edgar Hoover? Why wouldn't he use "Mr. Congeniality"? Weird old fart.
3. McCain never responded to Obama slamming "trickle down" economics. McCain never repudiated it as a failure so I have to assume he thinks it's working just fabulously.
4. McCain said, "We cannot have a failed start that nearly causes you to lose a conflict." What?
5. McCain also said, "That withdrawal is a result of every counter insurgency that succeeds."
6. McCain also said that Russia is a KGB apparatchik and that he does not want to go back to the cold war, and that in looking into Vladimir Putin's eyes, he saw three letters, K-G-B. And yet, he does not want to go back to the cold war with Russia? Sounds like he's already there.
7. John McCain told us that Obama's willingness to engage foreign leaders in dialogue is more than naive, that it's dangerous. He didn't explain what was better than doing that.
8. John McCain refused to speak directly to Obama. I thought that was interesting and directly condescending. He spoke to Jim Lehrer directly even when Lehrer told him to respond to Obama. It was as if McCain was saying, "No, let's us adults have a conversation here."
Now these are the new things that I saw in the debate. At the very beginning McCain said something about not shifting his position and I though Obama could have nailed him on shifting his position on the debate and he let it go. I thought Obama could have nailed him on his inability to build a coalition of republicans to pass the bailout while instead they are in full scale revolt to the Republican president's plan. Obama didn't work McCain over on the foreign policy failures of the republicans. He didn't hammer him on the low standing in the world of the US, although he did mention it. He let him off the hook about the failure of not talking and point to Richard Nixon's trip to China that helped bring about the changes in relations that are in place today. I thought Obama looked weak in relation to being in a debate format. I expected some fire and passion and I got logic and explaining and re-explaining and denials.
COME ON OBAMA! EAT SOME JALAPENOS OR SERRANOS OR HAVE A SHOT OF WHISKEY! or STEROIDS! DO SOMETHING! KICK THE TIRES AND LIGHT THE FIRES MAN!
On the lighter side, I had a sudden vision of Austin Powers last night when I saw McCain constantly cackling during Obama's answers.
Judge for yourself. (Hey, be kind, I only work in the "Paint" program, I can't afford the Photoshop!)
This Article has been viewed 167 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (1 total)The only comment I have relates to the paragraph almost at the end of your article.With the Democrats dominating both houses, why does anyone need a republican coalition to help pass a bailout bill? You seem to be a deep thinker, and I would really appreciate an answer.Hi Jeff,Good question but first let's be clear, the Senate is divided 49-49 with two independents, not a Democrat majority. Add to that the fact that in the case of a tie vote, the Republican Vice President casts the deciding vote in the Senate effectively giving the Republicans a slight advantage there. The House is a Democrat majority (for now) with 235 (D) and 199 (R) and 1 vacancy. (info came from thecapitol-dot-net the dot is supposed to be a period but the system won't allow me to enter the url in a comment.)I think that the House vote on Monday clearly indicates that at least on the bailout, the Democrats need Republican help to pass a bill. They failed to get enough votes on their own to pass the bill.Thanks for reading and I hope this answers your question.Missing Link
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.